I woke up.
There’s nothing more startling than a government led attack on a citizen, this Labour government was the reason I woke up and emigrated, it took a while to realise why my life had changed so much but in the end I noticed it was a government led attack on my personal life so having figured out I could do nothing to change the mindset of those around me, no matter how many agreed, the buggers still got back in.
Has this anything to do with Nominet? has this anything to do with politics? Yes, it has everything to do with both as I, you, the general domain registering public across the world and Nominet are under attack by the same government and I have woken up again.
It’s startling when you finally realise you are being savaged and embroiled by your own government but in any part of the world, it’s usually the point in which most citizens wake up to defend their rights against the threat they themselves can vote for or against.
Nominet is under attack and require all members to stand up and object or agree and post feedback on their website before 15th December, to not say anything now will ensure you have no right to moan and maybe no rights at all in the future, I woke up, have you?
Nominet are currently canvassing feedback on a well put together front on their website, http://www.nominet.org.uk/about/consultations/ I’d immediately like to draw your attention to the section layout, it is not obvious when you land that there are more pages that you should read and view before filling out the questionnaire. At the top are several sections from membership to pricing and two minute videos on each topic, please view these before responding, it helps.
Nominet has a simple job that can be very political and has become a very political target, many can ponder on what that government reasoning is, some will point to the chancellor and revenue raising, others will point to a threat to trust dominance by certain members due to voting irregularities and others can simply see socialist power in over drive.
However to seperate all these issues, you have to come back to the ground and support what we as registrars and members stand for, that being the governance of the uk name space and being able to ensure that stays a non political venture and yet at the same time provides security and ensures the board serves the wider general public and business around the world.
I’ve responded and would like you to do the same, I have included my response so you may understand what input others are making. We are all resellers of the ‘domain name’ product, we all have different interests but at the heart are the domain names. My background was firstly using domain names, churning and burning for affiliate marketing while keeping the best intact, the latter development was reselling domain names to end users and searching out those who may not realise thay actually needed the domain until I notified them, ensuring the right end user made the right use of the domain name.
I have concerns about the UK name space but don’t believe Government control is the answer, in the report they state a variety of concerns which I wish all membership to answer, I feel some government policies are misled and are against the freedoms of the internet but at the same time I believe there should be some form of agency protecting safe shopping and therefore making registrants accountable, I don’t believe protectionism is the answer however, more a trading standards overview perhaps.
There’s so much to have an opinion on and this is only the first stage but as highlighted in the final paragraph I feel Nominet have to be direct and in your face with Government concerns in the second part of the consultation and ensure no stone is left unturned, I live in an industry where I pick domains up when they drop on the day from the previous registrant and look to develop or resell, that’s my business and I see nothing wrong in that but I am open to others views on how my business can survive this consultation, one step in the wrong direction and another industry like affiliate marketing could be brought to a stand still, entrepreneurs on the net have never been so threatened so widely as they are right now but that’s socialists for you. Everyones got to be able to share the pie as long as the government of the time and those running it have the biggest share.
My reply to the first phase is as follows;
Together we can shape the future of .UK
Please take a few moments to let us know whether you agree or disagree with our proposals.
What do you think of our commitment to securing Nominet for the public purpose?
•We will hold .uk in trust for the nation
•With our registrars we will serve all UK Internet users equitably and fairly
•We will reinvest Nominet profits for the public purpose and Nominet will remain a non-profit distributing private company
I agree with the recommendation
The recommendations are sound, however one has to remember that we no longer live in an insular world, we live in a global business environment without borders and that in essence is the success behind the internet.
It is right that the UK nic should be able to run without politicians changing the rules for their own means, it is right that the UK nic is run without interventions either by the Chancellor and money raising or by business advisors within government who don’t really understand the scope and interests as varied as they are; from personal registrations to new set ups and within this I mean, the basic entreprenuerial spirit that enables business no matter how big or small to prosper when on a UK domain name.
Nominet should go further, welcome the world at large to the UK name space and registrars should serve the global community not only UK internet users or the nation. The City didn’t build its successes looking inwards but looking out to the world to do business.
Profits should be reinvested in Nominet structure and support projects to boost the UK domain name space and knowledge, to ensure safe shopping and yes regulate where needed but keeping in mind the freedoms that the internet has given and which should continue to be offered.
What do you think of our commitment to having strong Nominet governing principles?
•We will have an effective and well-balanced Board
•We will treat all members equitably and fairly
•We will adopt transparent and accountable Board procedures
I agree with the recommendation
The board has to be representative of not only members but the country and world, nominations of any board should be equal to the invested interest by that party. Members should all be treated in the same way, although granted we all have different vested interests in the name space.
I firmly believe any future board should be voted on the basis of one member one vote and not by any collaboration of other interests in other words not dependent on how many domains are under a members control or oversight, any one members views should be as important as another, therefore one member one vote is fair, any other way and it risks destabilising the very heart of Nominet, the board and control of the namespace and in my view a greater risk of government intervention which is why we are here today answering these questions.
I believe in a board supported by one member one vote, I trust a board run that way rather than a government led quango, I only have to open the newspapers and see how certain members of the Upper House do things in their own favour to realise any one member of parliament calling the shots in favour of misinformed business is not a risk we should allow to occur.
Any board should be transparant and accountable, the only way that is possible is by having one member one vote, nothing weighted, not taking account of registrations as this risks the neutrality of the PAB and therefore the trust of Nominet. I however support the above with this all in mind.
What do you think of our commitment to ensure that Nominet pricing is fair and flexible?
•We will ensure no interest group is favoured
•We will engage registrars and stakeholders if we are considering price changes
•We will be responsive to market condition
I agree with the recommendation
This is of great concern to me as I can see underlying factors for the questioning. Many registrars and members rely on renewals of registrations, supply and demand, turnover in the short term rather than the long term.
To ensure equality all vested parties should be treated equally, all registrants the same, all members the same. The scary part of any government intervention is knowing that nanny doesn’t always know best and under a socialist government the worry is more than under any other especially when domains are so tangibly entwined in many of our business interests which we hope only helps support the uk name space as well as our own interests.
I can envisage under government control, regarding price structure, that certain domains could reach hundreds or thousands per renewal. Whilst this may serve some huge business, I wholly believe that this will deny a large percentage of entrepreneurs from setting out on the internet in the uk name space thus degrading uk domain names.
Your statement in this part is vague but from what I’ve read pricing and market conditions and interest groups comes down to several factors, trading related domain names, domain availability, domain security and any possible auction system either cherry picked or with restricted status.
I firmly believe in first come first served, looking to other country nics where higher prices are set and more regulation, only devalues world interest and opportunity, the current government intervention reads as protectionism in the very worst form, this will devalue uk domain space and interest.
I believe trust and security can be offered without too much change. I understand the need for safe shopping, for creditable security in ownership of domain names and for a system of rights over trading names, however raising prices and or reacting to market conditions without proper consultation from members and business at large will see great harm done.
There are whole industries reliant on the uk name space, reselling of domains and churning of names within development, building minisites and mini-businesses within affiliate marketing to wholsesale dropshipping and individual shops online which can be destoyed by mere pricing changes or domain availability at cost and first come first served.
I do not trust government to be able to secure these industries and allow beginner entry and a first come first served basis and world urge the board to find a way to ensure entrepreneurs are not disembowled before their first step onto the net.
I do believe that there are ways to make the membership and board accountable and to ensure any secular member activity can be offered to a wider section of the public therefore allowing access to the nation and world at large without any protectionism or raised renewal fees, it goes without saying that if offered a chance to vote on lengthened domain renewals as offered in top level domains, then I would vote.
What do you think of our commitment to putting membership at the heart of .uk?
•We will maintain a self-regulated domain name industry
•We have a responsibility to reflect the diversity of all UKInternet users and put Internet users at the heart of .uk policy
•We believe a member-led Nominet will be best placed to deliver for all .uk stakeholders
I agree with the recommendation
Although governments can do as they wish, supported by whichever business interests and their voting monies, I firmly believe that Nominet should remain in trust away from political intervention.
The domain industry has members with wide ranging interests however all are fully paid up and wish to ensure the future of UK nic independence and self regulation and all should be able to ensure not only members but the UK, EU and world users are entertained and looked after within the UK domain space.
As a group of members we can sure the right board is voted in with a one member one vote capacity and vote through on the important issues facing the UK name space as detailed in the report but one has to be realistic and not bring in protectionism, it may be a space for the UK but it’s a space that the world visits and prospers within and enjoys visiting.
Do you think we have covered all the issues within this review period? If not, what do you think have we missed?
I believe these questions are very vague and do not go deep enough or cover what is at the heart of the government planned intervention, I would like full disclosure and in your face questions on everything in the report so that government can see that members can be responsive.
I don’t want to wake up to headlines over the next two years that the UK domain name space is to see wholesale changes because we weren’t honest now about how we can ensure our own business interests survive whilst still serving the general public and business at large.
*You can go back and edit comments after sending the form and my comments may change but equally I want to see more transparancy in the second consultation so as to ensure the membership replies directly to the the government’s fears and reasoning for applying for powers.
I’d also like to take this opportunity to urge for one member one vote in the future as the only way to ensure no one singular company, entity or interested party can steer Nominet to their advantage, which I believe is the overwhelming worry of the government behind the government, although I feel the Chancellor would love to get his hands on some of the revenue also.
Well that’s my yearly bout of seriousness out of the way, now where shall the future in laws and I go on holiday for Christmas. PS: Yes we bought the Volvo XC60 and I’m still a miserable git.
posted by Lee Owen